kmz file to open in Google Earth
There are a number of approaches that one may take in compiling a gazetteer. The most logical approach from the perspective of contemporary geographers might be to compile an exhaustive list of toponyms currently in use. The Official Standard Names Gazetteer series prepared by the United States Board on Geographic Names constitute such a compendium, and no attempt has been made to duplicate these documents (although they have been used as the source of latitude and longitude coordinates). Rather historical place-names have been emphasized.
Having made a commitment to historical place-names (although the reader will note some contemporary citations for cases of recent official changes), a decision remains with regard to the type of historical entries that would be most useful. In this gazetteer, no attempt has been made to provide spellings or usages that are "correct" in the sense of currently preferable in the academies and institutes of language of the several nations involved. Instead, this is a collection of place-names as they appeared in print. I have not attempted to correct obvious misprints in the original sources, nor have spelling errors been corrected. The entries are recorded here as they were published. Cross-references have been provided to allow the reader to determine the place of reference. There is little value, in an exercise such as this, in telling the reader what Pigafetta, Crawfurd, or other early chroniclers should have written; that is generally obvious. Rather, the real value of this gazetteer lies in its record of the given usage.
Although sufficient examples have been included to introduce the subject, no thorough attempt has been made to portray place-name variations arising from the use of different European orthographies (specifically Dutch versus English). As these variations are of a fairly regular nature, users are referred to the dictionaries cited in the bibliography.
Throughout at least the historical period in Southeast Asia, the concept of territoriality has differed from that observed in Europe and North America. One of the most striking pieces of evidence for this assertion is related to national boundaries. In general, the kingdoms and states of the region existed as extensions of a central, frequently sacred, capital city. Although at any given time possessing quite well-defined boundaries, the extent and location of those boundaries (and the fortunes of the states) fluctuated, often dramatically. Hence, it is often more appropriate to speak of the center as the state (for example, Ayuthia or Brunei). This issue has generally been resolved, for the purposes of this gazetteer, by citing the geographically smallest entity. Thus Chiengmai is listed as a town, despite the fact that this same name is also applied to a larger political unit.
The entries generally take one of two forms. Primary entries include: 1) the current name of a geographical entity; 2) a generic description, unless that is obvious from the name; 3) the nation(s) in which the entity is located (although this gazetteer should not be considered an official authority in this respect); 4) latitude and longitude coordinates; 5) other names which have been applied to each entity in the literature or in common English usage; and 6) occasional supplementary notes. As noted above, latitude and longitude coordinates are taken from the gazetteers of the U.S. Board on Geographic Names for the majority of entries. However, coordinates for certain ancient towns are approximations, and the coordinates supplied for physically large entities are for a central location. Names about which there is some question as to reference are noted with a question mark (?). Such citations are included for the sake of completeness, and should not necessarily be interpreted as an endorsement. Entries of the second type include: 1) a geographical name; 2) a reference (of the form "see _____") to the geographical name currently used to designate that entity; and 3) occasionally, a short bibliographic citation or explanatory note.
This is a gazetteer of given use, not prescribed or correct use. As such, this historical place-name cross-reference could be of potential interest to geographers, historians, and other social scientists studying the area. In the present case, a number of other purposes could also be served. Studies of Chinese trade and political relations with Southeast Asia could be facilitated by the material presented here. The same comment may be made with regard to contacts with India and the Arab World. Other uses might include the better comprehension of archaeological sites, research on floral and faunal assemblages based on historical references, and the linguistic and cultural analysis of place-name derivations. It is my belief that this gazetteer could be useful in a variety of other contexts, and it is my hope that the flaws that undoubtedly remain will not detract excessively from that usefulness.
Robert F. Austin, 1986.
A Historical Gazetteer of Southeast Asia
Institute of Mathematical Geography, Monograph Series.
Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Figure 1. See Austin's work on the surface of the globe in association with the text, all within a single window.
Best view: download the Google Earth .kmz file, open Google Earth, pull down file, and choose "open". Then navigate to where you chose to store the .kmz file and open it. Otherwise:
Links to individual images: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z. All layers, together.
Links to individual chapters: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z.
Link to movie.
|Figure 2. Why are the names beginning with C so clustered while those beginning with S are not? Is that observation of significance or is it simply a consequence of the selection of the subset of names from all names (or both)?|
|Figure 3. Test the geographic coordinates given in the Gazetteer against place names already present in Google Earth. Here, place names beginning with the letter "H" are used. The green hexagons show Gazetteer place names that also appear in Google Earth together with the yellow markers for the Google Earth locations. In most cases, but not all, the fit is good but not perfect. The case of Hermana Menor and Major cannot be separated at the broader scale and so a closer look is taken. The need to do so gives the reader a clear idea of the coarseness of the scale in terms of separation, or lack thereof, of icons. The set of all Gazetteer place names beginning with H is shown along with the hexagons to suggest the level of coverage between Gazetteer and Google Earth. In the case of this letter, the coverage is about half. Pink triangular icons mark locations in the Gazetteer but not in the Google Earth database.|
Figure 4. Zoom in, take a look around and think about how what you are seeing associates with what you already know about the location and also think about how it might offer guidance for related research paths!
An Electronic Journal of Geography and Mathematics,
Congratulations to all Solstice contributors.