INTRODUCTION:
Focus on Transformations.
The
First and Second Editions of the 3D
Atlas of Ann Arbor captured seven years of
work on this topic prior to June, 2007. While the
earlier files
in that work are important to understand the development of
the project
and also to track how technological and planning development
did or did
not mesh, the more recent files in it appear of greater
interest to
most. To interact
with the virtual reality in some of those files, a free
browser plug-in is needed; Cortona
is
one option.
In Google Earth®
one has simultaneously a
browser, a 3D navigational tool, and more. Thus, it is
important
to attempt to capture all of the previous 3D Atlas work within
the
Google Earth®
context and it was to that task that the Second Edition of the
3D Atlas
of Ann Arbor was devoted. This third edition greatly
expands the
base of buildings with textures, including many on the campus
of The
University of Michigan. Indeed, in this volume, one can
view the
buildings of the university in the context of 3D models of all
of Ann
Arbor. Thus, the entire city is modeled. The
models
in this book also appear in the
Google 3D Warehouse: in the Google Picks section, under
Featured
Modelers (Arlinghaus is "Archimedes" in the 3D Warehouse
world) as well
as in the "Cities in Development" section and in the "Help
Model a
City" section. In the latter, readers are invited to put
textures
on existing models in order to create a larger virtual Ann
Arbor.
The hope is also that readers of this book will consider
participation
in that effort, as well! The reader of this book will
need to
download
a free version of Google Earth®
in order to understand the
content. It is highly recommended that the reader do so
right
now, before proceeding with the remainder of the work.
As Google Earth®and
Google SketchUp®
have both broadened and facilitated the technological
3D modeling scene, deeper reflection on the pair in an
academic context
is interesting, as well. When thinking of making models,
one
might think only of making them in Google SketchUp®.
There, numerous
tutorials walk the user through the intricacies of making
highly
detailed, realistic models of buildings, furniture, or
whatever else
one might imagine. As long as the models are only for
Google
SketchUp®,
the enthusiastic user tends to get more and more involved in
making
"accurate" representations of objects. When these models
are also
to be uploaded into Google Earth®,
and viewed at a variety of geographical scales, perhaps in
conjunction
with many other models, a host of other issues enters the
picture. Now, both the worlds of art and of mathematics
enter --
at the theoretical level. From the standpoint of art,
realism may
not be as important in the Google Earth®
setting as is "impressionism"--create the correct impression
of the
building and use very few textures, keeping file size
small. As
Renoir painted a red hat in detail on the woman in "Sur la
Terrace,"
while leaving the background vague, the careful modeler may
focus on a
block M on a golf course clubhouse chimney seen from a busy
street
rather than on "accurate" textures of all sides. The
recognition
of the building in Google Earth®
comes from selecting features that people relate to and
recognize
quickly: that is the art in moving across the Google
interface
from
SketchUp®
to Earth®.
Indeed, it is that interface itself, or transformation from
one
software package to another, that is of critical importance to
successful modeling. Perhaps it is not surprising that
the 3D
modeling environment came to recognize that fact, much as
20th century mathematics came, in the last half of that
century, to
focus on the transformations themselves rather than on
acquisition of knowledge about the objects linked by those
transformations. The Google SketchUp®/Earth®
pairing, and the associated transformation it represents, is a
bold
step in moving forward: now, the focus in the
virtual
world, as well as in the mathematical world, is on
transformations.
Sandra Lach Arlinghaus,
June 1, 2007, Ann Arbor, MI.
Link to
Google Earth®.
Copyright, 2007. All rights reserved. Institute of
Mathematical Geography.